Google Used To Find Websites. Now It Answers For Them.

Google isn’t just putting AI on top of Search, It’s moving the whole experience towards something that looks a lot more like a chatbot. Recently, the company said Search is becoming “bigger and more interactive”, which sounds friendly enough until you realise what that means.

The old Google was simple: You searched, Google showed websites, and you picked where to go.

The new deal seems to be: You ask, Google answers, and the websites become supporting evidence somewhere underneath.

Instead of the familiar list of blue links being the main event, Google increasingly wants to give you a generated answer, follow-up questions, AI-powered suggestions, and even agents that can monitor information or help complete tasks for you.

As a user, I can see why that might be attractive. Why browse one site when a system can browse 100, compare them, and give you an answer in record time?

But… the web is full off millions of websites, blogs, apps, social media posts, and so much more that can be discovered. That all gets lost to select chosen few by agents, and the runners up get pushed down the page where the laymen will never go.

I’ve started writing posts to show that there are still humans on the internet. The old hope was that Google might pick up one of my posts and place it alongside other useful results, giving people a choice of where to go next.

But I guess that all changes.

With AI Overviews, AI Mode, information cards, featured snippets and all the other little steps before this, it feels like Google has been slowly training us to stay on Google.

As someone who often wants to find something niche, or discover which sources are actually saying what, I find it baffling that Google seems willing to trade its roots as the map of the web for becoming the destination itself.

I’ll keep posting, because that’s partly the point. But my little corner of the web suddenly feels like something Google might summarise, bury, and move on from.

2 responses to “Google Used To Find Websites. Now It Answers For Them.”

  1. Scary times Duncan. I have a concern that blogposts and articles being written today were developed with AI. That is definitely the case from seeing fake BBC articles scammers have written.

    Seeing Google gobble up network traffic of websites, or a YouTube video getting less views because an AI summarised it is upsetting to hear.

    I wonder how effective AI would be if we did make new YouTube videos as if they were from 2008-2009 and we had no microphones? In theory, there’d be no transcript, so nothing for the AI to go off of.

    1. Agreed, and if the AI overview picks up information from the fake BBC article and presents it as a confident fact, that’s terrible for everyone.

      I suspect with AI able to scan photos, it wont be long (if it hasn’t happened already) before it’ll be able to get context from videos too. Scary times!

What do you think?